Ex Parte Meetings with Plaintiff’s Health Care Providers

Posted Tue 5th Jun, 2012 | by | on Legal Insights

In his June 3, 2012 Order, Arapahoe County District Court Judge Carlos Samour, Jr. issued an important ruling.  He denied Defendants’ Motion to meet with Plaintiff’s health care providers ex parte (i.e. without Plaintiff’s counsel present).  This is a great ruling for both our client and all Plaintiffs since it means Defense counsel may not meet with our client’s health care providers without providing us with notice and allowing us the opportunity to attend the …

Read More

Your Accident and Social Media

Posted Fri 1st Jun, 2012 | by | on Legal Insights

In these technological times, it’s not surprising that when a person gets into an accident they want to put the details on Facebook, Twitter, blogspot or some other social media site.  However, it’s important to know that these postings can often be used against you by the insurance company and their attorneys if you later decide to make a personal injury claim and may possibly even be admissible in court.  While posting accident pictures and …

Read More

Dog Bites and Medical Bills

Posted Wed 30th May, 2012 | by | on Legal Insights

If you have suffered a serious bodily injury due to a dog attack, it’s important to know your rights, particularly with respect to your mounting medical bills.  Under C.R.S. 13-21-124, a dog’s owner is strictly liable and responsible for an injured person’s economic damages (i.e. medical bills).  This is regardless of the viciousness or dangerous propensities of the dog or the dog owner’s knowledge or lack of knowledge of the dog’s viciousness  or dangerous propensities.  …

Read More

Introduction of Medical Bill Payments

Posted Mon 21st May, 2012 | by | on Cases

In a recent series of Colorado Supreme Court Cases, the Court held that evidence of amounts paid by health insurance companies, Medicare, etc. (otherwise known as “collateral sources”) to cover an injured Plaintiff’s medical expenses are not admissible into evidence.  As a result, this means the jury will only hear evidence of the amount of medical expenses actually billed to the Plaintiff versus the reduced amount that was paid by a collateral source.  This is …

Read More